At the heart of these questions and concerns are four issues:
1. Theology/Doctrine
The concerns generally come out of the believers understanding of the Bible and how Christian faith and church is to be practiced in the world. There seems to be an assumption that there is a pure type of Christianity, that is already in existence or that we can somehow achieve this pure Christianity. It is perceived by some of the questions/concerns that native traditions and ideas would somehow taint pure Christianity.
The questions and concerns fail to recognize the European influence and the incredible amount of European symbols already mixed into the practices of the church and society. The cross and the Bible are the prime examples of the European influence on Christianity. The questions and concerns are asking if the native practices are right or wrong, however it seems that no one evaluates or questions what already exists in the church and Christian practice. The Euro-centrality of the church and the syncretistic practices of hundreds of years are conveniently overlooked
Native tradition for the most part is monotheistic in belief. The people who practice profess a belief in only one God/Creator. However, some traditional people call or rely upon spirits or spirit helpers to give guidance and strength. But does that mean that the Holy Spirit cannot be invited into a ceremony? The ceremonies/traditions in some instances need to be practiced in different locations (outdoors), but I don’t believe they need to be changed. The focus of any spiritual practice has to be on the relationship of God/Creator, Jesus the Son, and the Holy Spirit with His people.
Further to this, the questions and concerns are, at times, coming from a less than objective mindset. The questions generally arise from a person who believes that the personal theology and the doctrines that he or she holds to are so right and so proven that they cannot possibly be challenged or that doctrines cannot be shaped by new perspectives. The comments then become comparisons of one belief against another or an imposition of Christian doctrine on to the traditional practice or belief.
2. Personal struggle with God
The concerns are sometimes really asking, “Would God be pleased?” I have met a lot of Christians who have a Christianity based on fear. They internally struggle to know if God loves them or if God is pleased with them and thus they live out a faith where they question everything they or someone else does. They choose to do or not do based on their own answer to whether God is pleased with them. I don’t recommend people blindly go into ceremonies, where they do not trust the leader or have no idea about what is going on. Because you have to be wise in this respect and be careful, but I also would say that about church.
It is unfortunate that there are not many followers of Jesus leading native ceremonies, so if a person is genuinely seeking for answers then they may have to rely on non-Christian elder. It’s not such a bad thing to be taught by a non Christian elder, provided that the elder is someone who is trustworthy.
Each individual has their own limits and I never recommend people do something they are not comfortable doing, but just because one person is not comfortable with something it doesn’t mean we all have to be uncomfortable with it
3. Personal Issues
The strength of Christianity is that it offers hope to anyone in need. However its strength is sometimes its weakness, Christianity attracts dysfunctional people, who then become dysfunctional leaders. Christianity attracts people who have problems with relationship, have issues of fear, anger, control, and addictions, and who truly do not understand honesty. It consistently attracts people who have a poor self-concept.
These are people who have always been told what to do and how to act and thus they lack confidence in their abilities and even more damaging they lack confidence in God’s abilities. Their questions sometimes speak of their own personal fears, such as their fear of rejection, fear of failure, and fear of the unknown.
4. Fear of People
I think it is sad that a whole generation of native people have not been given education or the freedom to practice their tribes or family’s traditional practices. The decision on whether or not traditional practices were of value was made for them by missionaries, churches, and Indian agents, who for the most part seen no value in the traditional practices.
Christians and churches are afraid to talk about native traditions because they fear that they will be blackballed or will lose friendships. So they do nothing, because it’s just easier to maintain the status quo
Fear is born out of ignorance and misunderstanding. Fear of rejection, fear of the unknown, fear of failure and fear of abandonment are some of the common fears that people encounter. Fear can be and is a great motivator. People will act or not act because of fear.
I think that a lot of the confusion, misunderstanding, and rejection of this topic is motivated by fear and not by sound reason. Fear causes a person to close up their understanding and reasoning ability, it causes a person “to put up walls”. When we encounter fear our defence mechanism is usually either to fight or flee.The dynamic that takes place in the church about this topic is to fight against it or to close the door on it and reject it
God-centred spirituality vs. Culture-centred spirituality
I strongly promote, from a Christian perspective, First nation culture and traditions, but it is not a promotion of culture to the point where culture and tradition takes the place of God. I don’t think Jesus would be or is displeased when we worship him and pray to the Father in a traditional ceremony.
To have a truly healthy and effective spirituality, Jesus, the Son of God, the Holy Spirit, and the Father of All has to be the focal point. Culture and tradition is a tool that helps to teach us about God/Creator and is to be used to improve our relationship with God. With God/Jesus as the focal point of any tradition, practice or ceremony, then the possibility of the traditional practice to harm the worshipper is minimized.
Tradition when it is misused and misinterpreted allows for the animals, elements, or ceremonies to be in control. Creation and ceremony when given control becomes our spiritual guide, and thus our God. When culture, traditions, or objects are in control or are given control, then an abnormal spirituality is created that is based upon superstition and fear. I don’t think God meant for any tradition or ceremony to be in control of our spirituality. I believe true spirituality is found when an individual meets the Father in a setting or place that the Spirit has arranged.
So with that in mind I feel that every believer, when in a ceremony or service, needs to ask him or herself the following questions, “who is in control here?” Is it me?
Two important considerations for the leaders within this theological revolution
Although I am in favour of practicing Christianity in a purely First Nations setting and I have a set of beliefs and answers to the following questions, I believe there are a couple deeper theological considerations that need to be asked of the collective and should be addressed by all those involved in practicing Christianity in a First Nations manner.
-
To what extent should First Nations traditions be incorporated into the present church context and into the life of the individual follower of Christ? Are their limits that need to be set
-
If traditional ways have been incorporated into a local ministry, to what extent should a Non-native person participate in native traditional ways